Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325-345 (Oxford Early Christian Studies)


Product Description
Is it true, as has often been claimed in recent years, that there was no real controversy in the period immediately following the Council of Nicaea? Sara Parvis, in this lively and meticulous study, argues not. She shows that the two opposing parties which had formed in support of Alexander of Alexandria and Arius in the years before Nicaea continued their activities afterwards, targeting one another with ruthless zeal at a series of synods which may look neutral but are revealed to be demonstrably partisan. Only the deaths of all the original party leaders except Marcellus of Ancyra, and the rise of Athanasius, broke the impasse which followed and allowed new political and theological configurations to form.Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325-345 (Oxford Early Christian Studies) Review
This work is very informative and full of information concerning Arian Theology and the debates that surrounded it between Nicea and Chalcedon. This is well written and a fairly easy read.Most of the consumer Reviews tell that the "Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325-345 (Oxford Early Christian Studies)" are high quality item. You can read each testimony from consumers to find out cons and pros from Marcellus of Ancyra and the Lost Years of the Arian Controversy 325-345 (Oxford Early Christian Studies) ...

No comments:
Post a Comment